(해설)
1) argument의 내용
volunteer 활동에서 얻게 되는 의욕(energy)과 안정감(sense of well-being)때문에
volunteer 활동을 하는 사람은 하지 않는 사람보다 조기에 재취업을 한다.
2) weakening the argument
의욕(energy)과 안정감(sense of well-being)때문에 조기 재취업이 가능한 것이 아님을
지적해 준다.
3) 정답 (C)는 조기 재취업이 volunteer 활동에서 얻게 되는 의욕(energy)과 안정감
(sense of well-being)때문이 아니라 volunteer 활동에 종사하게 하는 개인적 성품을
고용주들이 원하기 때문임을 잘 지적해 준다.
>안녕하십니까? 아래의 아규에 대해 답이 이해가지 않아서요.
>설명 해 주시면 너무 감사하겠습니다.
>Doing altruistic volunteer work has psychological benefits for volunteers,
>such as increasing their energy and sense of well-being. These benefits
>can, in turn, have other unexpected benefits, as witnessed by the fact that
>laid-off middle managers who occupy themselves by doing volunteer work
>
>get new jobs sooner, on average, than those who do not volunteer.
>
>Which of the following, if found to be true, would most seriously weaken the
>argument?
>
> A person who is laid off generally experiences a diminished sense
> of well-being, whether or not he or she later does volunteer work.
> The majority of former middle managers who do volunteer work after
> being laid off cease to volunteer when they find a new job.
> The personality characteristics that predispose people to do volunteer
> work are characteristics that employers look for in prospective new
> employees.
> Laid-off middle managers who do volunteer work do not in general get
> jobs directly related to the volunteer work that they do.
> People who are involved in volunteer work have, on average, somewhat
> greater longevity than people who are not involved.
>
>답 좀 설명해 주세요. 답이 c라는 데...
>이해가 가지 않네요...
>
|
|
